I configured all the servers as file servers because the server consolidation products I tested aren't meant to consolidate domain controllers (DCs) or application servers. I consolidated to these servers individually to test how the products worked with the different OSs none of the products consolidated more efficiently or effectively to one OS than to the other. For target servers, I used newer and more powerful computers with more available disk space than the NT source servers. I arranged the shared folders' permissions to simulate a typical corporate user environment. For source servers, I used two NT servers to store individual users' roaming profiles and one NT file server to store shares. First, I tested the products using a Windows NTÂequipped target server, then I retested them with a Win2K-equipped system. To evaluate each product's features and usability, I consolidated three source servers' shares, user profiles, and data to one server. The Windows 2000 Magazine Lab tested four server-consolidation products: Aelita Software's Aelita Server Consolidation Wizard 5.63, FastLane Technologies' DM/Consolidator 2.6.2, NetIQ's Server Consolidator 2.0, and Small Wonders Software's Secure Copy 2.0. These tasks are time-consuming, but tools exist to make the job easier. If you also want to move user profiles, you need to update your users' accounts to point to the new profile locations. You need to copy data to your new servers, recreate shares on the new servers, and reset permissions on the data. Whether consolidating file servers is part of your plan to trim management overhead or part of your strategy to migrate to Windows 2000, you have your work cut out for you. 4 products that transfer data between servers
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |